Game Of Thrones As early Daenerys shocking transformation in Season 8 has been betrayed

“Game Of Thrones”: As early Daenerys’ shocking transformation in Season 8 has been betrayed!

Is the dramatic development of Daenerys in the fifth episode of the eighth season of “Game Of Thrones” a logical step or the unnecessary destruction of their character? It’s a moot point But it is certain: Their conversion was indicated early.

Attention, this text contains spoilers for the fifth episode of the eighth season of “Game Of Thrones”!

Attention, this text contains spoilers for the fifth episode of the eighth season of “Game Of Thrones”!

Probably will discuss whether the conversion of Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) from the good-natured blaster of the chains and dragon mother to murderous tyrant during the eighth season was a logical development or a hasty rush job “Game Of Thrones” fans for a long time.

But one thing is: you would have – as so often in “Game Of Thrones” – have guessed. In the second episode of the fourth season Bran (Isaac Hempstead Wright) namely a vision in which the harrowing events are already strongly indicated “The Bells”.

In the second episode of the fourth season Bran (Isaac Hempstead Wright) namely a vision in which the harrowing events are already strongly indicated “The Bells”.

Dragon shadow over King’s Landing

On the one hand we see in Brans vision a shadow over the rooftops of a city that the basis of the building clearly as king mouth (in Orignal: King’s Landing) is to identify (in the video starting at about 3:18 minutes).

At the latest after seeing “The Bells” is unmistakable that there must be a dragon in the shadow of the winged creature. The fiery destruction that Daenerys and Drogon wreak consecutive 8.5, was therefore already indicated four seasons before.

Rain of ash in the throne room

Even before the dragon scene we see in the vision as well as an adjustment of the throne room of King’s mouth along with the Iron Throne (at 3:12). The roof of the building is missing, the hall is deserted and it seems to snow. With the knowledge of “The Bells” in mind is now clear that it is rather the rain of ash caused by Daenerys and Drogon well, the fall down here on the Iron Throne.

And the destruction of the throne room and the ashes were even hinted earlier. In the tenth episode of season to Daenerys finds namely even during her vision in the house of the immortals in the devastated, apparently snow-covered throne room again:

In the tenth episode of season to Daenerys finds namely even during her vision in the house of the immortals in the devastated, apparently snow-covered throne room again:

And in fact, the output of the fifth episode of season eight can even here already guess: Before Daenerys’ face in fact not form clouds of breath, so it’s not cold, and her torch melts the “snow” on the ground to recognize not (very good from 1:25) – apparently it is therefore also ash that falls from the sky through the ruined ceiling of the throne room.

“Game Of Thrones” episode 8.4: The biggest Aufreger was cut – that you missed on free TV

About the visions that have indicated in “The Bells”, the dramatic developments, we reported after the airing of the episode on US television and on Sky tvreview. At the free TV premiere of the eighth season of “Game Of Thrones” on RTL II we have reprinted this article and updated.

.

After an accident turning the Cowboy Bebop series from Netflix is ​​delayed massively

After an accident: turning the “Cowboy Bebop” series from Netflix is ​​delayed massively

Netflix began just beginning to turn a series adaptation of the cult anime “Cowboy Bebop”, as is the production again still: actor John Cho has been injured. Seven to nine months nothing will now happen!

When a leading man injured on the set, which is doubly painful: For the person and for the organizers in the crew. Finally, must now be rescheduled consuming because the actors and sets usually only for a certain time frame required or are posted.

When Daniel Craig in the last race on the set of – injured “James Bond No Time to Die” and turned out for several weeks, which prepared the creators powerful headaches – but John Cho, star of the Netflix series “Cowboy Bebop”, is now considerably longer need to recover.

As Deadline and The Wrap namely report, the production of “Cowboy Bebop” is stopped after a set-accident John Cho for seven to nine months!

As Deadline and The Wrap namely report
is the production of “Cowboy Bebop” stopped for a set-accident John Cho for seven to nine months!

Opposite Deadline sources have described the accident as a “freak accident”, but are in no additional details. So it’s probably a failed accident that no one could foresee. He is said to have taken place in the last shot of a well-trained scene. John Cho (known from “Star Trek,” “Harold & Kumar”) needs surgery because of his injury and then takes a long recovery period.

Netflix is ​​waiting for John Cho

According to Deadline Netflix do not intend to replace John Cho in the role of a bounty hunter Spike Spiegel. It was the actor who goes in the sci-fi series on the side of Mustafa Shakir (as a bounty hunter Jet) by ship Bebop on a mission, faithful committed. Netflix assured John Cho in a public statement “complete support”. The long delay of the shoot should significantly increase the cost of “Cowboy Bebop” series in any event and the start delay (a date was not yet known, but in 2020 we now appears unlikely).

John Cho thanked on Instagram for support, quoting Bruce Lee: “Water can flow or it can destroy.”

John Cho thanked on Instagram for support, quoting Bruce Lee:

“Water can flow or it can crash close to movies.” – Bruce Lee Thanks for all the well wishes everyone. Gonna be back and flowing in no time!

A contribution shared by John Cho (@johnthecho) on October 18, 2019 at 4:11 PDT

.

Thats why the Oscar chances of The Lion King have just fallen sharply

That’s why the Oscar chances of “The Lion King” have just fallen sharply

The remake of “The Lion King” is the most successful animated film of all time. to send the film, therefore, the Oscar race for best animated film would be as obvious – what Disney has not done so. We do not explain why.

With an international box office earnings from currently about 1.65 billion US dollars is the remake of “The Lion King” the most successful animated film of all time. Since it would nevertheless actually on hand to send the film in this category for the Oscars 2020 in the race. But the production studio looks apparently different: Disney has not submitted “The Lion King” as an animation film at the Oscars! But why not?

Disney has not submitted “The Lion King” as an animation film at the Oscars!

Is “The Lion King” at all an animated film?

In advance of the theatrical release was discussed, whether it is at all is an animated film with “The Lion King”. Surprisingly, especially director Jon Favreau in answering the question in an interview with Slash film was restrained:

“There was no real animals and no real cameras and there is not even motion capture recordings moviesfront. Everything comes from the hands of artists. But to say that we are dealing with an animated film would be misleading in terms of expectations. “

Some critics speculated that Favreau wanted to avoid with its slightly absurd-sounding statement to provide the film in advance with the label “animation”, which is often associated with the term “children’s film”. However, according to the conventional definition of the Academy Academy still is “The Lion King” clearly an animated film.

But
according to the conventional definition of the Academy Academy still is “The Lion King” clearly an animated film.

Because the criteria of the Oscar-guards are relatively clear: the submitted film must lead about a significant number of animated characters and use animation in no less than 75 percent of all images. With a running time of 118 minutes and only one non-animated scene remake is clearly in the definition. Why Disney has therefore yet decided against filing?

Disney’s reasons for non-submission

When Jon Favreau does not see himself his “Lion King” as an animation film, it gives indeed only makes sense that Disney also does not submit it in this category. The election campaign for the Oscars is to do something good always a possibility for the studios, their stars and partners by making advertising for them and their achievements. But in this case, just the opposite would be the case if Disney pulls against the classification of the own director in the Oscar battle.

When Jon Favreau does not see himself his “Lion King” as an animation film, it gives indeed only makes sense that Disney also does not submit it in this category.

Moreover, it would also far from certain that “The Lion King” is ever nominated – and that would be yes but a certain shame for the mice Studio, which can be avoided from the word go that way. only members of the Academy Academy active in the field of animation are the nominations namely responsible – and which are traditionally more classic animation and computer animation.

Moreover, it would also far from certain that “The Lion King” is ever nominated – and that would be yes but a certain shame for the mice Studio

The photo-realistic images of “The Lion King” will see many more as a threat to their artistic expression – after all it is in the animation cinema yes classically just not about creating a possible real look. Therefore, the chances are good that they’ve not vote on principle for “The Lion King”. Time not to mention that the movie’s just not arrived excelling despite the worldwide success and some viewers rather cold left with his photorealistic animals with their limited facial expressions.

.

Before Maleficent 2 Powers of Darkness That is why you part one should definitely have seen

Before “Maleficent 2: Powers of Darkness”: That is why you part one should definitely have seen!

In “Maleficent 2: Powers of Darkness” Angelina Jolie plays again the famous Disney antagonist, discovered her heart in the first film. And to enjoy the movies, should you “Maleficent: The dark fairy” know.

“Maleficent 2: Powers of Darkness” builds strong content of the events of part one on – even if have gone in history a few years into the country. In such cases, it is generally advantageous to know the predecessor. But here it is even more important! “Part 1 should therefore have previously necessarily seen!” They say in our FILM STARTS-criticism.

The relationship with Aurora

The central element of “Maleficent – The dark fairy,” the retelling of “Sleeping Beauty” -Märchens from the perspective of the fairy, is that it finally has developed positive feelings despite all the bitter disappointments and the previous betrayal of the people: (for Aurora Elle Fanning), that man, through which it has imposed the curse.

Exactly on this relationship is now expanding Joachim Rønning ( “Pirates Of The Caribbean 5: Salazar’s Revenge”), the directorial helm of the sequel “Maleficent – The Phantom Fairy” took director Robert Stromberg on. For they dragged him especially in the spell, as he told us in an interview: “What surprised me in the first film, is how much I grabbed the story of Maleficent and Aurora emotional – the story of a mother and a child.”

What surprised me in the first film, is how much I grabbed the story of Maleficent and Aurora emotionally

“And I am a father myself, so I could relate to it. In the second film, therefore, we also wanted to deepen this relationship and see where they are now. “

The bridge to “Maleficent 2: Powers of Darkness”

So the events set at six years after the events of Part One: Maleficent is remembered among the people as evil fairy. Their good deeds are simply ignored in the stories. Together with Aurora, she has crowned Queen of Moore, she watches over the fairy kingdom Recent Entertainment.

With a marriage proposal from Prince Philip (Harris Dickinson) to the young Aurora Maleficent it gets but once again with the very people to do to which they would prefer a wide berth. Especially with the love for a human man she has made one bad experience in supply! So she does not think much of the wedding plans and tried to dissuade her goddaughter.

Maleficent get it but once again with the very people to do to which they would prefer a wide berth.

Angelina Jolie as a showpiece

In the first part of it is great to watch Angelina Jolie in how it discharges the inner conflict of their role. And in the sequel Jolie impressed especially in such a character moments:

“If she clears Aurora about the pitfalls of love, then it is possible the actress, her character to give an immense emotional depth and ambivalence again,” it says so in our FILM STARTS-criticism.

“If she clears Aurora about the pitfalls of love, then it is possible the actress to give her character again an immense emotional depth and ambivalence”

but understanding of the audience for this emotional depth can best unfold precisely when one knows one part or good has remembered! As Joachim Rønning “refrains once vorzukauen all the inner conflict of the character,” how it is in our meeting, the audience should know best the conflict already:

but understanding of the audience for this emotional depth can best unfold precisely when one knows one part or good has remembered!

Namely that Maleficent as a warm-hearted young fairy (there’s played by Isobelle Molloy) was deceived once disappointed and her childhood friend Stefan (Michael Higgins). The compassion that the viewer in part one designed for them just now preparing the ground for understanding in the sequel.

Who his memory with “Maleficent – The dark fairy” will descend now again wants to help on jumps, or even for the first time in the Sleeping Beauty film from the perspective of the evil fairy, incidentally, gets on television the opportunity to do: VOX radiates fantasy fairytale today Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 20:15 in.

.

Midsummer No Ari Aster has not written off from Dinosaurs

“Midsummer” No, Ari Aster has not written off from “Dinosaurs!”

In a particularly disturbing scene of the cult horror film “midsummer” I had to think “Dinosaurs” from the nineties to the cult sitcom suddenly. As I address later director Ari Aster sure I get a surprising answer …

Note: In the following article a single scene is anticipated from the first third of “midsummer”.

Note: In the following article a single scene is anticipated from the first third of “midsummer”.

Sometimes it just happens in the movies that you have to think about a completely different film, or an entirely different series suddenly that does not fit at first to what is there just look at on the screen. Mir is about to “midsummer” (the best for me horror film of the year) as issued.

The film is about four American students who spend the summer in Sweden to take part in a small village community to the multi-day celebrations to a religious festival, which takes place only every 90 years.

But after the first of many rituals they realize that but probably was not such a good idea: Two elderly sect members climb a cliff and plunge determined 30 meters in depth – including painful to sighted Gore-effects when Surcharge. Then the other sects disciples beat the quivering, half-shattered bodies also carry a wooden club the skulls.

The idea: If the life cycle is passed, the followers plunge voluntarily surrendered themselves to death in order to start right their next life …

And what I immediately thought of this grotesque and brutal sight? Of course, the naughty puppet sitcom “Dinosaurs”, which has brought it between 1991 and 1995 at least 65 episodes.

And what I immediately thought of this grotesque and brutal sight?

In “The Schleudertag” (the third episode of the first season) the father Earl should namely throw his hateful mother in law from a cliff into the swamp, because they always only be a burden for the prehistoric society in their old age. Earl even been training hard to make it really to throw very far, when the big day has come.

Coincidence or not? We asked around!

Well I never really expected that there is indeed a connection between the states “Dinosaurs” and “midsummer”. Except maybe that both stories are based on actual existing rituals of past eras. But questions costs nothing …

… and so I have a director and writer Ari Aster ( “Hereditary”) just mentioned in our call out the parallels – and to receive a response with which I have really not expected.

Ari Aster knows “Dinosaurs” is not: “I’ve never seen the show. But since the film is in theaters here in the US, speak to me constantly people depends. However, I have never understood what that actually mean to you now just explained it to me. “After all, we were able to director So now explain why his film is compared to the cult puppet sitcom.

Ari Aster knows “Dinosaurs” is not:

But where did the idea? “The scene is the result of my research. There’s this story in the Swedish folklore that pretty much describes what you now see in the film. Namely that people have jumped at a certain age of a cliff. There are also these large wooden hammer, the families have taken advantage of this in order to bludgeon family members to death as soon as they are no longer useful.

But where did the idea?

I have these two traditions simply combined into one. Where you always have to remember that there are, of course, was there over the centuries a lot of hearsay. So you can be sure to have the extent to which these things actually took place as before. “

the realization

Sitting there in the cinema and has in his head suddenly a connection that seems so abseitig that they Surely no one else came to mind – and then told one of the director that he is asked almost daily since theatrical release it. we might therefore think people really like, than is commonly believed – even (or especially) when it comes to a nostalgic sitcom of the nineties.

“Midsummer” running in German cinemas since September 26 of 2019.

“Midsummer” running in German cinemas since September 26 of 2019.